In episode 366 UNP founder and curator Grant Scott is in his garage reflecting on the small and big things that impact on the everyday engagement we all have with photography.

Mentioned in this episode:
Murder Most Foul: Bob Dylan: https://youtu.be/lBFeocjkRIk?si=-QLifE7ALycAlWmw

Dr.Grant Scott
After fifteen years art directing photography books and magazines such as Elle and Tatler, Scott began to work as a photographer for a number of advertising and editorial clients in 2000. Alongside his photographic career Scott has art directed numerous advertising campaigns, worked as a creative director at Sotheby’s, art directed foto8magazine, founded his own photographic gallery, edited Professional Photographer magazine and launched his own title for photographers and filmmakers Hungry Eye. He founded the United Nations of Photography in 2012, and is now a Senior Lecturer and Subject Co-ordinator: Photography at Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, and a BBC Radio contributor. Scott is the author of Professional Photography: The New Global Landscape Explained (Routledge 2014), The Essential Student Guide to Professional Photography (Routledge 2015), New Ways of Seeing: The Democratic Language of Photography (Routledge 2019), and What Does Photography Mean To You? (Bluecoat Press 2020). His photography has been published in At Home With The Makers of Style (Thames & Hudson 2006) and Crash Happy: A Night at The Bangers (Cafe Royal Books 2012). His film Do Not Bend: The Photographic Life of Bill Jay was premiered in 2018.

Scott’s book Inside Vogue HouseOne building, seven magazines, sixty years of stories, Orphans Publishing, is now on sale.

© Grant Scott 2025


Discover more from The United Nations of Photography

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 responses to “PODCAST: A Photographic Life, Episode 366: ‘Cartier-Bresson Words, One Lens Creativity and Photo Book Titles’”

  1. There’s a lot in this episode to ponder. I appreciate your comments on HCB and agree that I prefer those interviews or lectures that probe the artist’s creative space as opposed to those fanboy (or fangirl) pieces that talk about gear or the artist’s “greatest hits.”

    As a photographer, I would like to suggest the line “Fiddle when I can/Work when I should” from John Denver’s “Thank God I’m a Country Boy” as something to explore.

    I admit that I do not identify with much of what’s in the song. I do admire the sheer joyfulness of the piece. It comes at you, wave after wave. For me, as an amateur photographer, the above line from this song reminds me how I feel about the craft. It brings me joy, and I would do it all the time if I didn’t have to earn a living doing something else.

    I don’t believe that all photographers should aspire to be professional photographers. I also don’t believe that the quality of one’s work depends on whether they are a professional or an enthusiast.

    The song is about a family of fiddlers-darn good ones-that fiddle for the love and joy of making music. They never made money from fiddling because that was never the point.

    For me, and for many, that’s the same feeling I get when I am out taking photographs (and not landscapes with my bag full of lenses). It’s a process – the research, the equipment, capturing the image, processing, printing, and exhibiting- that brings me happiness. Isn’t this also a legitimate pursuit, or does it have to be tied to some capitalist pursuit to be recognized as art?

  2. HC-B.

    Well, I think the paucity of worthwhile material is no accident. As you point out, the man was somewhat reluctant to bare his soul and it appears that he did his best to create an aura of mystery about himself. It’s my suspicion that he knew only too well that an excessive familiarity breeds boredom, if not outright contempt.

    At the bottom of it all, Magnum was and remains a business, and its prime objective, as such, is to turn a buck or two more than it spends. What, at the time, had it to offer that the competition did not? I guess that in real terms, not a lot, so the trick had to be to create illusions. This, in my memory, at least through H-CB, it sure managed to do. That stuff about holding contact sheets upside down, for instance: come on, I have had to produce zillions of them during my career, and especially from 135 film it was difficult enough seeing and reading the image if only because of the grain of the SWG paper itself. Not every darkroom owned an 8 x 10 Durst! As for discovering or checking design and “geometry” that way, it’s great drama to feed camera clubs. You get – or should get – framing right in camera.

    The decisive moment is a bit of a con too: if his trigger finger was held until he saw decisive moments, how come he had to use contact sheet; were they all perfect shots in each sequence, did his sheets hold thirty-six keepers? Methinks they held the same truth as anyone else’s: the visual proof of the progression of working the scene, working it until something good was nailed.

    This may come over as unkind; nope, I think him a great photographer, but I do not feel that appreciation that I hold is dependent on hype. I can understand why he abandoned photography and returned to the pencil and the brush. I came into photography via that route, and if I had been good enough, capable of making it as an artist, I wonder whether my parallel love for photography would have been the eventual road to which I opted to dedicate my life. The great problem with photography is that in the end, success or otherwise depends on nothing more than opinion, and those crucial opinions are not always well informed ones. Of course, much the same is true with art. Accountancy suddenly sounds less depressing a career path than I thought when I was in my teens.

Leave a Reply to Peter CannonCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from The United Nations of Photography

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading